Secure coding training
Hands-on workshops for developers: common vulnerability classes, secure C/C++ for embedded systems, web and API security, with exercises on real code.
TrainingSecure development
Most vulnerabilities are written, not deployed. We help your developers avoid them with secure coding training, expert code review, threat modelling and a secure development lifecycle that fits your tools and pace.
In short
Secure development means building security into every phase of software and firmware development: requirements, design, coding, testing and maintenance. Zyberum provides secure coding training for development teams, manual source code review supported by SAST, threat modelling, and secure SDLC and DevSecOps implementation aligned with the Cyber Resilience Act, ISO/SAE 21434 and IEC 62443-4-1.
What we offer
Hands-on workshops for developers: common vulnerability classes, secure C/C++ for embedded systems, web and API security, with exercises on real code.
TrainingManual review by experienced security researchers, backed by SAST tooling. A thorough review can eliminate up to 90% of future vulnerabilities.
Identify threats and security requirements early, in design workshops with your architects (STRIDE, attack trees, TARA).
Security gates, SAST and SCA, secrets scanning and SBOM generation integrated into your CI/CD pipeline.
Testable security requirements derived from threats, regulations and standards, traced through to verification.
Your development process assessed against the CRA, ISO/SAE 21434 or IEC 62443-4-1, with a prioritised roadmap.
Why it pays off
A vulnerability found in code review costs a fraction of one found after release, especially in firmware for devices and vehicles that are hard to update.
Regulation now demands it: the Cyber Resilience Act, ISO/SAE 21434 and IEC 62443-4-1 all require a documented secure development process and evidence that it is followed.
FAQ
Secure coding is the practice of writing software that avoids common vulnerability classes such as buffer overflows, injection flaws and broken authentication. It combines developer knowledge, coding guidelines such as SEI CERT C, MISRA or OWASP, and tool support.
A code review analyses the source code directly and finds root causes, including issues that are hard to reach from outside. A penetration test attacks the running system like a real attacker would. They complement each other; for critical products we recommend both.
Yes. In-house workshops use examples from your technology stack and, on request, anonymised findings from your own code.
Get started
Tell us your tech stack and team size. We propose training and reviews tailored to your code.

Your call is withTom ZaubermannFounder & CEO, Zyberum
We reply within one business day.
Your privacy
We use cookies and similar technologies to measure our website and the success of our ads. You decide which ones we may use. You can change your choice at any time via "Cookie settings" in the footer. Privacy policy